If there is one thing that this space prides itself in, then it is its ability to initiate conversations and seek alternative views on matters of shared interest.
We only have the privilege of being landlords of these columns, but that does not mean we hold the monopoly of having all the knowledge and perfect insights of what goes on in various trades that we comment on.
However, the value we will never lose is to be the currency through which debates are ignited, providing a space where ideas can be exchanged and most importantly presenting an opportunity for everyone who holds an opinion on a particular issue to be heard.
That is why, most importantly we left open the lines for anyone to offer feedback on anything espoused here. That feedback channel sustains debates and conversations until they reach their meaningful end. If you have a voice, then you deserve to be heard.
I am, therefore, thankful to each one of you who continues to offer feedback in every form on issues that are tackled here. It brings a fulfilling feeling and in a way validates the engagement which this space was designed for.
This week, I am not the man for the show. I am ceding my rights to one Nthangwanika Kondowe, who sent her feedback on my last week’s entry titled ‘The Cosoma PR machinery should set its engine rolling’.
When I got her feedback, I did not want to reason with her in private for an issue which is in the public domain. I simply sought her permission to have her position reproduced on this page. Gladly I got the nod. I hope her take will enhance the debate on this issue and also offer new insights.
Thank you Nthangwanika, please write again. Here is her take on the matter. Verbatim:
Dear Brian,
I read your article, ‘The Cosoma PR machinery should set its engine rolling’, in The Nation and I’d like to offer some feedback.
Let us be clear: this is not a PR issue; it is a governance issue. The Copyright society of Malawi (Cosoma) does not need another press briefing or polished communication strategy. What it needs is accountability, transparency and respect for its members.
Cosoma has consistently claimed that it uses log sheets to determine royalty distribution. Yet, if you speak to radio station staff, they will tell you Cosoma hasn’t collected those in over a year. On what basis then are they distributing royalties?
Equally troubling is the fact that Cosoma has not submitted financial reports for a long time. Perhaps they feel these reports are “too complex” for members to understand, but such an excuse is both patronising and dishonest. It reveals a fundamental lack of respect for the very artists and rights holders they are mandated to serve.
This is why I believe your article frames the problem too narrowly. Cosoma’s challenges will not be solved by a more active PR department. They will only be solved through serious governance reforms. I would hate for Cosoma to read your piece and think they need to host another press briefing when, in truth, what is required is for heads to roll.
Thank you for your contribution to this important discussion. I hope future articles will push the conversation beyond PR and address the governance failures that are at the heart of this crisis.
Sincerely,
Nthangwanika
